Friday, September 02, 2005

Panther Matchups | by Michael

Time to break down a few match-ups in Saturday's game. There really shouldn't be too many surprises, since both Dave Wannstedt and Charlie Weis have a fairly significant head-to-head history, as we reviewed in our Know Thine Enemy series in July. More important than the talent match-ups loom the coaching adjustments. We've heard for the past nine months about Weis's prowess with Xs and Os, so what might we see Saturday night?

Irish OL vs. Panthers' DTs
Converted defensive end Thomas Smith has been penciled in at one interior slot since spring practice and, earlier this week, sophomore Corey Davis was named the other starter. Here's some background on Davis, who redshirted last year. Also, as many already know, Smith recently suffered a knee injury which has prevented him from practicing; that said, he is expected to be ready for Saturday's game.

The experienced and talented Irish offensive line should be able to push these two around, and if the middle of Pitt's defensive line can be dominated, it should enable Weis to get more creative with his formations so as to prevent Pitt from dropping the safety into the box. What I mean by that is, if our OL can get a great push and consistently open up some holes in the middle, Weis can spread Pitt's defense with 3 or 4 receivers, which will force Pitt to either put their nickel package in the game (again, softer defense since a LB is replaced by a DB) or play riskier coverages with potentially little-to-no deep help (should Pitt choose to keep a safety committed to stopping the run).

Charlie Weis vs. H.B. Blades
Blades is a great run-stuffing middle linebacker but his weakness is defending the pass. He's smaller (probably closer to 5'11 than 6'0) with great instincts, and he was moved from the strongside to the middle in order to get more athletic linebackers on the field. Remember the 2002 game where Pitt's Gerald Hayes dominated and the Irish struggled to run the ball? Blades is as talented a playmaker.

Weis may want to put Blades in uncomfortable situations by going with 3 or 4 receivers. I'm not sure if Blades is in Pitt's nickel package, but if he's not, it's certainly a softer defense. If he is, it's likely that he's the weak link in the back seven (against the pass). New England did the same thing to Philadelphia's Jeremiah Trotter in the Super Bowl, although the Eagles were a more blitz-heavy team than Pitt will probably be under Wannstedt. Still, the Irish have the advantage of having not only a deep WR corps but also versatile personnel at TE, with whom they can both spread out or pound away on the Panthers. It should be interesting to see how Weis attempts to lessen Blades' impact on this game. What we do with our TEs early in the game could be an indication of our gameplan; if we spread them out, or ask them to line up in the slot or out wide, watch out for quick draws or screen passes to Darius Walker.

Maurice Crum vs. Erik Gill
Tyler Palko's security blanket killed us last year and is one of the better balanced TEs in the country. Enter Rick Minter and the Apache backer. The whole idea behind the Apache is to get more speed on the field by sacrificing size. Crum's performance in his first start, in prime-time no less, is one of the bigger questions in the game. There should be little question that he'll be a target of Matt Cavanaugh's offense from the first snap. Todd Heap was a vital cog in the Ravens' offense, which often employed two TEs, and I think Pitt will try to do similar things in 2005. Forget the pass for a moment; Pitt's power rushing attack is likely going to run right at Crum, and whether or not he can shed blocks and make tackles may ultimately be more important than how well he defends Gill in coverage. Keep an eye on this battle early on in the game.

Irish Front Seven vs. Pitt Rushing Attack
If the front seven can hold the Pitt's running game in check, then a safety can be used to double Greg Lee. However, if the front seven needs one of the safeties to help out in the box, Matt Cavanaugh's options will expand and I would expect to see Palko take some shots deep, which brings us to...

Ambrose Wooden vs. Greg Lee
Purely an educated guess that Wooden will defend Lee to start the game, although I also wouldn't be surprised to see ND rotate its defenders on him, even if that includes Mike Richardson, who was torched down the stretch of last season. Although Wooden has earned some acclaim for his play in fall camp, and he looked good in limited action in last year's Oregon State loss, this is a difficult assignment for any corner, let alone one with very little tangible experience. Expect Minter and Bill Lewis to do all they can to make Wooden's job easier, but if the front seven can't stop the run, that could leave Wooden on an island at times.

If you're the Irish coaching staff, you clearly want to make 5'7 former walk-on Joe DelSardo beat you rather than Lee. DelSardo had 49 catches in 2005, but half of those came against Furman (7), Rutgers (8) and in garbage time of the blow-out loss to Utah (9). As I see it, the key is shutting down Lee, even if it means doubling him on every play. Make DelSardo beat you.

If Notre Dame can control the majority of those match-ups, I would expect a victory. What I love about this game is that not only do so many match-ups favor ND, but so do the adjustments. If Dave Wannstedt and Matt Cavanaugh favored a more aggressive offense, and if they had the talent at WR to spread the field with 3 or 4 receivers, I'd be more concerned. But right now, Pitt's talent fits the power running game they've chosen as their base offense, and that plays to the strength of the ND defense.

Chat with Pitt Sports Blather | by Jay

Yesterday morning we caught up with the excellent Panthers blog, Pitt Sports Blather. We posed some questions to PSB about tomorrow's game, and PSB was more than happy to fill us in. This is a very condensed version of the chat, but if you want to read the whole thing, head on over to PSB where it is being posted in installments throughout the day.



Blue-Gray Sky: Hey, we just saw that Rashad Jennings gets the nod as the starting tailback for Pitt. Who is this kid?

Pitt Sports Blather: Jennings was supposed to be part of the class of 2004 but had to do a year of prep school for academics. Pitt got him over Virginia Tech. He fits the mold of the style of running back Wanny and Cavanaugh like. Big strong, in between the tackles, etc. RB depth was a question last year. Tim Murphy, the starting fullback spent time at tailback, and is one of my favorites. He does, however, have issues with staying healthy. Having both in the backfield actually gives Pitt some options and chances to confuse. He's older than the typical freshman and has the added feature of having NFL bloodlines ‑‑ both his brothers were minor players.

I think Jennings will eventually see the bulk of the work if he performs as expected. In the first game or two, though, unless he busts it huge, expect to see him get half with Brandon Mason and Murphy getting the rest. In fact an article in the P‑G today quotes Cavanaugh about the RBs.

Is the TE a weapon in the Wanny attack? Should we be looking for a play‑action pass to the TE on the goal line?

Well, it sure as hell was with Cavanaugh in Baltimore. Our tight ends go Gill, Buches, Strong and Pelusi. Gill, well, you guys saw him rumble last year...both Gill and Buches scored against the Irish last year. I'm sure they are on the mind of ND coaches. Buches is a solid blocker and decent hands. Not very fast though. Strong’s a converted WR, and is the best athlete and with great speed. His issue, and he's even admitted it, is blocking. Vital for a TE, but he is the most intriguing of the bunch. He’s a guy that would be expected to catch the ball either over the middle or on a screen. Strong came here over Auburn because he was promised a shot at QB ‑‑ quickly realizing that the Harris offense was too much. As a quarterback, he was kind of a mobile Byron Leftwich type. He dropped his weight and is now around 240, he's 6'5".

How about wide receiver Greg Lee. He’s pretty good, isn’t he?

Against ND, Lee is going to be facing double coverage (at least). The way he improved from the start of last year to the end of the season was astounding. Not only did he start to use that talent, but he got a mean, tough streak going. Fighting for the ball and at times ripping it from a defender. I expect Lee to face a lot of bumping off the line, but he is good enough to beat it. The shoulder ‑‑ again an article today ‑‑ is apparently fine. Last fall he missed some camp time with a leg injury. He, like so many WRs, seemed willing to nurse the injury to take some extra time.

After Lee, you’ve got flanker Joe DelSardo ‑‑ pure possession WR. 5' 7" great hands, willing to go over the middle, not speedy, but smart and precise route runner. Despite Wanny loving speed and size none of the bigger kids could beat his consistency or hands. The guy everyone thought might even beat DelSardo was Terrell Allen. He came in with Lee and was actually more highly recruited. As a freshman (‘03) he provided late season spark in the return game. He got a season ending injury in '04 spring drills and was easily injured again in fall practices. Very frustrating for all that he can't stay healthy. It was a free‑for‑all with no one getting too consistent until the end. Derek Kinder is the #3 WR. He caught one pass last year as a freshment ‑‑ a 3 yd TD against ND.

I remember that particular score – and the other four to go with it. Palko had quite a game. Speaking of Palko, he’s getting a lot of press. Does he deserve it?

Palko’s as good as advertised. His father is one of the top high school coaches from Western PA. Not just strong and athletic, but he has the head for it. Last year, he started very poorly ‑‑ the Walt Harris offense was very complicated and no matter how much you practice until you play it for a bit, you will struggle.

Do you think Wannstedt and Cavanaugh will let him scramble as much as he did under Harris ‑‑ at least it seemed he was always scrambling. That was one of his best weapons. I remember that really helped against BC last year.

Given the O‑line last year, he had no choice. He did his reads when he had time but he wouldn't waste inordinate amounts of time if they weren't there. At times he was prone to just taking off if he didn't see something right away. He has said that he likes to smack helmets. ND recruited him to be a safety.

Do you have a new O‑line coach or is he a holdover?

New. Paul Dunn, Pitt alum and formerly at Kentucky and K‑State for the O‑line. On offense, they are all new coaches, defense remained completely intact. Yep, even the DC who was (shudder) up for the top job.

Were Pitt fans happy with the defense last year?

No, we were not. The defense was a sore subject. I don't speak for all, but I'm not that high on Paul Rhoads the DC.

I read where Wannstedt won't be making the defensive calls. I was surprised.

I'm not sure I completely buy it.

We'll keep an eye on him this Saturday. If Wanny's making too many hand gestures to the defensive huddle, we'll know something's up. Anyway, What’s the word on Pitt special teams?

I think we've got the best 1‑2 PK and P combo in the Big East in Cummings and Graessle. The special teams are definitely emphasized more, and with more speed. Watch for freshman LaRod Stephens on kickoff returns. Lots more speed.

Let's get down to brass tacks, as Grandpa Simpson would say. PSB, Pitt's strengths in this game? Weaknesses?

Passing game, obviously. I think the running game will be a pleasant surprise, but not a strength right away. Definitely passing to set up the run. Secondary is a big strength ‑‑ provided Pitt is more aggressive and plays tighter coverage. Weaknesses include the D‑line. They'll be better (can't be much worse) but how much is a big question. Especially going against a well known strength of the Irish. Pitt was horrible against the run and only got 22 sacks for the season. The O‑line is a big question. Can they open holes for the run? I think they'll be fine for pass protection. I think the lines are question marks for both teams.

Line play, line play, line play. I'll be watching how it plays out in the trenches. mostly. Stuff in the secondary is "sexier" but a lot of that has to do with the type of coverage ‑‑ what kind of position does it put a defender in?

So, what does Pitt need to do to win the game?

Starting on the defense, the secondary has to be big. I have no doubt that Walker will get his yards. The defense has to be aggressive. Do some blitzing and not wait for things. That will have to come from Coach Wannstedt.

On offense, Pitt will be running. I expect a few 3‑and‑outs where they almost inexplicably run. Then the passing game will start. I would prefer to see Pitt come out and try and throw deep on the first possession just to really rev up the crowd if nothing else ‑‑ even on an incomplete – that would get people juiced. The passing game will likely dominate in the 2nd and 3rd qtrs. Only if Pitt's behind will they still throw more in the 4th.

Any predictions?

First game, new coaches, new systems, everyone a little too hyped. Some sloppy play with a bunch of penalties mar the first half.

Pitt, even when they were a pass‑oriented offense, still kept time of possession very even or better (check last year's box score). The run gets results, but it is still in the air. Still, it is a low scoring game, because neither head coach is a run up the score ‑‑ more just enough to win.

Pitt wins, 23‑19.

We're going with the Irish, 31-24. I think we need a friendly wager. How about...the loser puts up a picture of the winner's choosing on his blog?

Sounds fair. Picture goes up on Monday ‑‑ maximize the viewing pain.

Thanks for the chat. Best of luck on Saturday.

Thank you. One of us will look smart by Saturday night!

Thursday, September 01, 2005

Ranking the Irish | by Pat

In one of the comments for the position preview wrap-up, someone wanted to know where I would place the Irish positions in relation to those of our opponents. I figure this might be good for a few laughs later in the winter, so here we go. Again, I'm not going to consider things like coaching and will try to stick with variables such as talent, potential, depth, and production. So, let the prognosticating begin:

Quarterback - 1. USC ; 2. Michigan; 3. Tennessee; 4. Pitt; 5. MSU; 6. Stanford; 7. Purdue; 8. BYU; 9. Syracuse; 10. Washington; 11. Navy.

To me, the Irish QB position would fit in between Tennessee at #3 and Pitt at #4. I'm sure people will claim that Palko is a better quarterback than Quinn, but at least Quinn's backup Wolke isn't a true freshman like Palko's backup. I'm not sure Wolke's career three handoffs mean much, but it's something. The game this Saturday will go a long way to seeing if this was a wise pick or not. Tennessee deserves a higher slot because Erik Ainge and Rick Claussen are both experienced quarterbacks.

Running back - 1. USC; 2. Michigan; 3. Tennessee; 4. Purdue; 5. Stanford; 6. Syracuse; 7. Michigan State; 8. BYU; 9. Washington; 10. Pitt; 11. Navy.

Right now, I'd put ND between Tennessee and Purdue. While I love Walker, we don't have the depth of USC or Michigan and, right now, Riggs of Tennessee is a better all-around running back. Don't forget Tennessee has All-American caliber fullback Cory Anderson.

Wide Receiver - 1. USC; 2. Tennessee; 3. Purdue; 4. Michigan; 5. Michigan State; 6. Stanford;
7. Pitt; 8. BYU; 9. Washington; 10. Syracuse; 11. Navy.

This is a tough one. We have depth, seniority, and talent, but production has been shaky. I'd love to blame it all on coaching, but at some point players need to step up too. Right now, I'm going to say the Irish receiving corp should go right before Michigan's, but I'm not completely sold. Arguing that we don't have a Breaston-caliber receiver is valid point, but they don't have our depth. Which is more important? Hard to say.

Tight End - 1. USC; 2. Purdue; 3. BYU; 4. Michigan; 5. Pittsburgh; 6. Tennessee; 7. MSU; 8. Washington; 9. Stanford; 10. Syracuse; 11. Navy.

Fasano, Carlson, and Freeman equal a solid #2 ranking ahead of the Boilermakers and breathing down USC's neck. Fasano isn't quite the weapon that Byrd is, and Fred Davis is a great athlete, but I really think John Carlson is going to have a breakout season.

Offensive Line - 1.Michigan 2. USC; 3. Tennessee; 4. MSU; 5. Purdue; 6. Stanford; 7. Pitt; 8. BYU; 9. Washington; 10. Syracuse; 11. Navy.

Hmmm.... First off, I'd probably switch USC and Michigan now given the loss of Jake Long. The Irish have great experience and talent on the front five, but there is a disconcerting lack of depth; especially at the tackle spots. I'll be optimistic and say that ND fits into just barely ahead of Tennessee. Just barely.

Defensive Line - 1. Tennessee; 2. Purdue; 3. Michigan; 4. USC; 5. Stanford; 6. Syracuse; 7. Washington; 8. BYU; 9. Pitt; 10. MSU; 11. Navy.

Talent or depth, depth or talent? I think Notre Dame's front four are just as good, if not better, than USC's. But the Trojans have a little bit better depth thanks to their lights out recruiting of late. So let's put the Irish between USC at #4 and Stanford at #5.

Linebacker - 1. Tennessee; 2. Purdue; 3. USC; 4. Michigan; 5. Washington; 6. Syracuse; 7. Pittsburgh; 8. Stanford; 9. BYU; 10. MSU; 11. Navy.

As of now, I'd put the Irish linebackers between Michigan and the Washingon Huskies. A bit low, but for all their potential, Crum and Vernaglia are unknowns when it comes to game-time production. I'm trying hard not to drink the Irish kool-aid and move them up a spot.

Secondary - 1. Tennessee; 2. USC; 3. Pitt; 4. Michigan; 5. Purdue; 6. Washington; 7. Syracuse; 8. Navy; 9. BYU; 10. MSU; 11. Stanford.

Another spot where being a homer has its pluses and minuses. Another fan would see "loses three starters from nation's next to worst pass defense" and sit us at a table with Stanford. Heck, I did as much in my secondary preview. But I'm rather bullish on the additions of Wooden and Ndwuke to the starting lineup, and expect Richardson to improve on last season's performance. Then again, both backup safeties are true freshman. I think somewhere between #5 Purdue and #6 Washington is fair, but we aren't very far ahead of Washington.

So, there you have it. Any wild disagreements out there?

And the award goes to... | by Pat

As the 2005 season rapidly approaches, the various college football award organizations are releasing their initial lists of award nominees. Granted these lists will change with plenty of new names showing up as the season is under way, but it's a decent way to get a look at who are considered some of the better players in college football. Here's a quick recap on the Irish players who are included on the inaugural nominee lists, as well as those nominees who will face off against the Irish this year.

Maxwell Award - College Player of the Year Award

Notre Dame Nominees
Brady Quinn

Opponent Nominees
Tyler Palko - QB, Pitt
Steve Breaston - WR, Michigan
Michael Hart -RB, Michigan
Chad Henne - QB, Michigan
Drew Stanton - QB, Michigan State
Reggie Bush -RB, USC
Matt Leinart - QB, USC
Dwayne Jarrett - WR, USC
Steve Smith - WR,USC
LenDale White -RB, USC
Gerald Riggs, Jr. - RB, Tennessee
Damien Rhodes - RB, Syracuse


Davey O'Brien Award - presented to the nation's best quarterback

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Tyler Palko - Pittsburgh
Chad Henne - Michigan
Drew Stanton - Michigan State
Matt Leinart - USC
John Beck - BYU
Erik Ainge -Tennessee


Doak Walker Award - presented to the nation's best running back

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Mike Hart - Michigan
Jerod Void - Purdue
Reggie Bush - USC
LenDale White - USC
Curtis Brown - BYU
Damien Rhodes - Syracuse


Biletnikoff Award - presented to the nation's best wide receiver

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Greg Lee - Pittsburgh
Jason Avant - Michigan
Steve Breaston - Michigan
Dwayne Jarrett - USC
Steve Smith - USC
Todd Watkins - BYU
Robert Meachem - Tennessee


John Mackey Award - presented to the nation's top tight end

Notre Dame Nominees
Anthony Fasano

Opponent Nominees
Erik Gill -Pittsburgh
Tim Massaquoi -Michigan
Dominique Byrd - USC
Daniel Coats -BYU


Bednarik Award - college football defensive player of the year

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
H.B. Blades - LB, Pitt
Gabe Watson - DL, Michigan
Darnell Bing - DB, USC
Jason Allen - DB, Tennessee
Omar Gaither - LB, Tennessee
James Wyche - DE, Syracuse


Bronko Nagurski Trophy - presented to the best defensive player in college football

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
H. B. Blades - LB, Pittsburgh
Gabe Watson - DT, Michigan
Ray Edwards - DE, Purdue
Darnell Bing - DB, USC
Cameron Jensen - LB, BYU
Jesse Mahelona - DT, Tennessee
Jason Allen - DB, Tennessee
Jeremy Chase - DE, Navy
Jon Alston - LB, Stanford


Dick Butkus Award - presented to the nation's top linebacker

Notre Dame Nominees
Brandon Hoyte

Opponent Nominees
H.B. Blades - Pittsburgh
LaMarr Woodley - Michigan
Joe Lobendahn - Washington
George Hall - Purdue
Dallas Sartz - USC
Cameron Jensen - BYU
Omar Gaither - Tennessee
Kelvin Simon - Tennessee
Kelvin Smith - Syracuse
Jon Alston - Stanford


Jim Thorpe Award - presented to the nation's best defensive back

Notre Dame Nominees

Opponent Nominees
Bernard Pollard - Purdue
Darnell Bing - USC
Jason Allen - Tennessee
Anthony Smith - Syracuse


Lombardi Award - presented to the best college lineman (offense or defense)

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
H.B. Blades - LB, Pittsburgh
Matt Lentz - OG, Michigan
Tim Massaquoi - TE, Michigan
Jesse Mahelona - DT, Tennessee
Adam Stenavich OL, Michigan
Gabe Watson - DL, Michigan


Outland Trophy - presented to the best lineman in college football (offense or defense)

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Gabe Watson, DT, Michigan
Matt Lentz, G, Michigan
Manase Hopoi, DT, Washington
Jake Kuresa, OL, BYU
Jesse Mahelona, DT, Tennessee


Ted Hendricks Award - presented to the nation's top defensive end

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Ray Edwards - Purdue
Pierre Woods - Michigan
Lawrence Jackson - USC
Frostee Rucker - USC
Manaia Brown - BYU
Parys Haralson - Tennessee

Rimington Trophy - presented to the nation's best center

Notre Dame Nominees
no one

Opponent Nominees
Chris Morris - Michigan State
Brad Vanneman - Washington
Lance Reynolds - BYU
Ryan Kalil - USC


Lou Groza Award - given to the nation's best kicker

Notre Dame Nominees
D.J. Fitzpatrick

Opponent Nominees
Garrett Rivas - Michigan
Josh Cummings - Pitt
Ben Jones - Purdue
James Wilhoit - Tennessee


Ray Guy Award - presented to the nation's best punter

This award doesn't name its nominees until after the season is underway. It's a safe bet to say that D.J. Fitzpatrick will be nominated. As for opponents, USC's Tom Malone and Michigan State's were semi-finalists a year ago so they should be considered among those who will be nominated. There is a good chance that Pitt's punter Adam Graessle will be named as well.

Man in the box! | by Jay

Instant Replay makes it way to Heinz Field. Here's the rules:

  • Reviews are triggered by an observer in the press box. The plays are reviewed on video tape directly from the television network broadcasting the game (in this case, ABC).
  • A play can be reviewed only if the observer in the box decides to take a look at it before the ball is snapped again.
  • Pass interference calls are not subject to review under the Big East's instant replay setup. Among the other non-reviewable calls are holding, offside, personal fouls, illegal blocks, face mask, taunting or roughing the passer or kicker.
No word if Joey Mack and the rest of the Z-105 Morning Crew get to weigh in on the call.

Pitt Hits | by Jay

Are you keeping up with the glut of previews, reviews, interviews and other assorted fluffy bits of media commentary swirling through the noosphere this week?

Neither are we. The sheer volume of stuff (from near and far alike) for ND's first game this year is overwhelming; I feel like a little kid at Chuck E. Cheese, trapped in a cage of a thousand plastic balls.

Still, let's take a stab at pulling out some of the more interesting bullet points we've come across, and give a few links worth perusing in full.



Charlie Weis: "Brady Quinn is all-day tough." Brady Quinn: "Charlie is extremely blunt and honest."

Greg Lee, 100% and ready to go.

Freshman Rashad Jennings gets the start at tailback for Pitt. 6'1", 235 pounds. As Keith would say, he...is...a...hoss.

Bill Lewis talks about a possible edge for the Irish, since he worked for Wanny last year. Per the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review:
"It's going to be very exciting to compete against (Wannstedt)," Lewis said. "You get in that situation where you're competing against a good friend, and I've always enjoyed that. I think that brings out the best in your competitive spirit."

"Whatever information (about Wannstedt's schemes) that coach Weis would want me to share, I'll certainly share," Lewis said. "We'll try to study Dave's background and then the background of his coordinators and so forth."
• Pitt defensive back Darrelle Revis loves that the season starts off with a bang (unlike other teams):
"Notre Dame is a great, historic program. I watched them, growing up," cornerback Darrelle Revis said. "It's gonna be a tough game. A lot of teams open up with smaller schools, but we're moving up to the next level. We're going to be ready."
• Über-cornerback recruit (and Pittsburgh native) Darrin Walls will be in attendance on Saturday. He's got both ND and Pitt on his final list.

• Unlike Charlie, Wannstedt won't be calling any plays on Saturday.

As for actual game management, he said he will allow his coordinators to call the plays, but he will be in constant contact with them and will offer his suggestions based on situations.

He also said he will keep offensive coordinator Matt Cavanaugh on the field (as opposed to in the press box) for games because he wants him to keep in close contact with quarterback Tyler Palko.

"I think it's important that Matt's down on the field with Tyler," Wannstedt said. "He's a guy that gets very emotional. And there will be good plays, and there will be great plays, and there will be some not so great plays in every game. And I think that the relationship that those two guys have right now, I think it's important that they're looking eye to eye in talking during the course of the game."

• Speaking of Cavanaugh, he's got some bittersweet history at Pitt as a former Panthers quarterback.

• Here's a fantastic profile of Darius Walker. We're banking on 1,500 yards for Darius this year, and according to this piece, his parents will be sure to see every one of them.

• Another entry in the NFL-to-college storyline, care of the Indy Star. Interesting for an Ivan Maisel backtrack (you know, the guy at ESPN who said repeatedly after the firing of Ty that "the mystique is dead" at Notre Dame):
"Any school with the tradition and foundation of a Notre Dame or USC doesn't need a lot of time," said Ivan Maisel, a college football writer for ESPN.com. "It took Pete Carroll a season-and-a-half. Maybe the Notre Dame administration was on to something when they determined that three years was long enough for Tyrone Willingham to prove himself."

• Charlie thinks that the presence of twin towers Maurice Stovall and Jeff Samardzija, both 6'5", gives this ND team a unique advantage (per Tim Prister in the Indy Star):
"It's a different group of guys than I've ever had before. I've never had that kind of size," Weis said. "There aren't too many teams playing with receivers that size...I told [Quinn], 'You've got to be loving this, seeing those guys lined up on either side of you.' "

"Coach is real big on mismatches, whether it be a running back on a linebacker, a mismatch in height between a receiver and a DB, or if we're in the slot lined up on a linebacker," Samardzija said. "If guys want to come up and (closely defend) me or Mo or Rhema, it's tough for them to stop a guy who has height and maybe 20 or 30 pounds on them. It's intriguing for (Weis)."
• Just because Charlie's new, and the guys are learning a brand new system, don't look for a vanilla offense at Pittsburgh.
Said Weis: "With that veteran offensive line returning and with the number of veteran skill people we have, it allows me to be versatile. I don't have to come out here and be conservative."
David Wolke's our #2 quarterback behind Quinn.

• One difference between Charlie and, say, Bob Davie? Charlie actually appreciates Lou and Ara, and isn't afraid to lean on them for advice.

• Wanny returning to Pittsburgh has much of same resonance as Charlie returning to ND.
"It feels like we've got a guy who understands what we go through, who's walked to class the same way we do, who understands the mentality in this town," Palko said. "People might leave Pittsburgh, but they migrate back because their roots are there. That loyalty is part of the mentality of Pittsburgh. It's a blue-collar mentality that goes back to the steel mill days. You wake up early in the morning, you go to work for 10 hours, come home, eat dinner and go to bed. When you wake up, it's the same thing again.

"Coach Wannstedt has lived it, so he understands everything about it."

Pawn to Queen Four. The chess match has already begun:
Notre Dame coach Charlie Weis, the New England Patriots' offensive coordinator last year, said Wannstedt will "look at (H.B.) Blades as his Zach Thomas," now that Blades is playing middle linebacker. Wannstedt coached Thomas with the Miami Dolphins.

When told about Weis' comparison, Wannstedt gave a cryptic response: "He's probably going to try to block H.B. Blades like he blocked Zach Thomas." Thomas had just eight tackles, his second-lowest output of the season, against the Pats in 2004.

• Even Tyler Palko's grandmother jumped his ass for dropping an F-bomb on NBC last year.

• Our offensive line has to be licking their chops at the state of Pitt's defensive front:
“I feel good about our secondary and our linebackers, we’ve just got to unfold the defensive line,” Wannstedt said. “That’s the one position that I’m not really sure [about].”
• A nice read on Charlie from the Philly Daily News. Seriously, it's better than ninety percent of the puff profiles that came out this week. Check it out if you have a few minutes.

• Ryan Harris gets brutally honest:
Players scoff at the notion that Notre Dame's talent might be the root of the problem. They point to the number of prep All-Americas that come into the program each year, saying Notre Dame remains a national player in recruiting.

"To say that there is no talent here is insanely inaccurate," Harris said. "But we can't fault people for saying that because we have played like there wasn't any talent. Obviously we haven't been playing to our abilities."

• Was it all a dream? Unfortunately not:
In three years using the West Coast offense [under Ty Willingham], the Irish never clicked, never ranking higher than 81st in the nation in total offense. Their usually strong running game averaged a school-worst 127.4 yards a game last season.
• Yet, change is afoot:
"We're a game-plan oriented team that is concerned with matchups personnel-wise," Weis said. "It's not about West Coast or East Coast. It's all about personnel groups and multiple formations. I think the more you can get the defense thinking and less reacting, the better chance you have."

Weis has spent a lot of time during preseason camp trying to make sure the Irish are ready to react to anything opponents, officials or circumstances throw at them. He found that was a weak spot when he arrived.

"I think when we first started you could have said we were the Bad News Bears. But I think as this has gone on, our players are starting to think on their feet," he said.
• If Pitt linebacker H.B. Blades can see it, why couldn't Ty?
“Their running back and offensive line worries me the most,” Pitt junior middle linebacker H.B. Blades said. “They are big and have been playing together for two or three years now. They are very good run blockers.

“I think the running back is the best player on the team. He’s got great vision and can see holes that no one else can see. He’s the best player on their team.”
• A pretty decent Wannstedt profile from the Chicago Sun-Times. No individual quotes worth picking out, but take a look if you want to familiarize yourself with the history of the feathered-hair Panther coach.

• Lastly, Jason Kelly talked to Ara about the dinner he shared with Charlie last week, and the conversation between the two coaches.

"I didn't impart anything," Parseghian said. "We just discussed Notre Dame, we discussed football. It was just interesting to hear him say how they were handling their offense and so forth, what kind of audibles they called and how they did it. Those were very interesting to me because I've been gone for a long time."

He might not be current on all the modern tricks and intricacies, but Parseghian figured out something only an elite few coaches have.

How to win at Notre Dame.

Time doesn't diminish the significance of that, and aside from the evolving strategies, the elusive means to that end remain very much the same.

Since Parseghian has a 95-0 lead on Weis in the wins department, the new guy wanted some of that wisdom to rub off on him.

"Just hearing his approach I think was a very educational experience, because you could see how he approached the game and how he approached all the little sidebars that go with being the head coach at Notre Dame," Weis said. "It was quite educational."

From Parseghian's perspective, Weis already completed the most important task -- conveying confidence to a battered team. Confidence in himself, in the players, in the plan the coaching staff would implement.

During his first meeting with the Irish, months before the 1964 season began, Parseghian outlined his expectations point by painstaking, inspiring point, from conditioning to conduct.

Then he illustrated his utter trust in that system with a promise that must have sounded borderline insane to returning players who won only two games the previous year.

"I remember telling them, 'If you follow this format, we will win, and we will win this year,'" Parseghian said. "That is very important. You've got to make them believe. But the important thing is you must believe yourself, and it's very evident to me that Charlie believes in himself and he believes in this team."

Thinking of family, friends, and strangers | by Pat

Our prayers go out to all the victims of Katrina. I'm sure that, like us, you know some folks down South whose lives have been uprooted (or worse) as a result of the hurricane.

On the local front, Blueandgold.com posted a story detailing the impact on members of the Notre Dame football team and coaching staff.

Quite a few organizations have set up relief funds. One close to our hearts is Catholic Charities. Give 'til it hurts.

2005 Opponent Preview: Wrap-up & Rankings | by Pat

Over the course of the summer we've taken a look at this year's Irish opponents, position by position. Now we'll bringing everything together into one big summary.

Here's the method behind the madness: I'm going to list all the rankings by position, add them up, and give each team an average overall rank. From that average, we'll list out the 2005 opponents, best to worst.

Keep in mind though, that these rankings are based not just on talent, but also on depth. Important factors like coaching and home game vs. away game aren't being considered here. This is merely a rank of how the opponents stack up talent-wise. We'll also include Michael's excellent coaching turnover reviews so that you can have a one-stop shopping look at this year's opponents.

(Also, if you have any good captions for the coaches' photos, go ahead and throw them in a comment.)



1. USC Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 1
Running backs - 1
Wide Recievers - 1
Tight End - 1
O-Line - 2
D-Line - 4
Linebackers - 3
Secondary - 2

Average Rank: 1.875



2. TENNESSEE Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 3
Running backs - 3
Wide Recievers - 2
Tight End - 6
O-Line - 3
D-Line - 1
Linebackers - 1
Secondary - 1

Average Rank: 2.5



3. MICHIGAN Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 2
Running backs - 2
Wide Recievers - 4
Tight End - 4
O-Line - 1
D-Line - 3
Linebackers - 4
Secondary - 4

Average Rank: 3.0




SWM seeks friendship,
4-loss season.

4. PURDUE Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 7
Running backs - 4
Wide Recievers - 3
Tight End - 2
O-Line - 5
D-Line - 2
Linebackers - 2
Secondary - 5

Average Rank: 3.75



5. PITTSBURGH Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 4
Running backs - 10
Wide Recievers - 7
Tight End - 5
O-Line - 7
D-Line - 9
Linebackers - 7
Secondary - 3

Average Rank: 6.5



6. STANFORD Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 6
Running backs - 5
Wide Recievers - 6
Tight End - 9
O-Line - 6
D-Line - 5
Linebackers - 8
Secondary - 11

Average Rank: 7.0



7. MSU Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 5
Running backs - 7
Wide Recievers - 5
Tight End - 7
O-Line - 4
D-Line - 10
Linebackers - 10
Secondary - 10

Average Rank: 7.25



8. BYU Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 8
Running backs - 8
Wide Recievers - 8
Tight End - 3
O-Line - 8
D-Line - 8
Linebackers - 9
Secondary - 9

Average Rank: 7.625



9. WASHINGTON Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 10
Running backs - 10
Wide Recievers - 9
Tight End - 8
O-Line - 9
D-Line - 7
Linebackers - 5
Secondary - 6

Average Rank: 8.0



10. SYRACUSE Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 9
Running backs - 6
Wide Recievers - 10
Tight End - 10
O-Line - 10
D-Line - 6
Linebackers - 6
Secondary - 7

Average Rank: 8.0



11. NAVY Coaching Summary

Quarterback - 11
Running backs - 11
Wide Recievers - 11
Tight End - 11
O-Line - 11
D-Line - 11
Linebackers - 11
Secondary - 8

Average Rank: 10.625

2005 Opponent Position Preview - Secondary | by Pat

Last in our series on opponent position breakdowns, but certainly not least, here's a look at the safeties and cornerbacks that the Irish will be facing this year. These cover men should be of particular interest, as Coach Weis hopes to establish a more productive offense in 2005. So just what kind of defensive backs will be lining up to stop Notre Dame's hopefully-improved passing game? Let's take a look.

All stats from 2004. Handy abbrevations: TFL - tackles for loss. INT - intereception. BrUp - passes broken up. FR - fumble recovered. FF - forced fumble. STP - Stone Temple Pilots.

PITTSBURGH

CB - Josh Lay. 22 tackles, 0.5 TFL, 3 INT, 12 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
CB - Darrelle Revis. 49 tackles, 0.5 TFL, 2 INT, 1 FF. - Returning Starter.
SS - Mike Phillips. 30 tackles, 2 INT, 9 BrUp, 1 FF.
FS - Tez Morris. 85 tackles, 3 BrUp, 1 FR. - Returning Starter.

Pitt's secondary is an interesting case. They have size, talent, experience, and return starters. But the unit finished last season as one of the lowest ranked pass defenses in the country. With three returning starters, it's obvious that this year they will look for a dramatic improvement in that number. All-Big East Josh Lay is extremely tall for a cornerback at 6'2" which will help when defending taller receivers like Maurice Stovall and Jeff Samardzija. He really improved over the course of last season and should be one of the better corners that Notre Dame faces this season. Revis (right) was a freshman all-american last year and one of the bigger surprises on the Pitt defense. He did miss the ND game last year so Irish receivers haven't had a chance to go against him yet. At 6'0", he also has plenty of size and with a year of experience should be a formidable defender. Phillips has shifted to strong safety from corner, where he started six games last season, and should bring even more speed to the Pitt defense. Morris is entering his 4th year as a starter at free safety and finished 3rd on the team in tackles last year so he has proven production as well as experience. Depth: Sam Bryant provides Pitt with a larger (220lb) strong safety for when more run support becomes a consideration. Reggie Carter doesn't have much experience at backup corner, but is Pitt's 3rd corner at least 6'0" tall.

MICHIGAN

CB - Leon Hall. 48 tackles, 1.0 TFL, 2 INT, 8 BrUp, 2 FR. - Returning Starter.
CB - Grant Mason. 20 tackles, 1 INT, 1 BrUp, 1 FF.
SS - Brandent Englemon. 13 tackles, 1 FF.
FS - Willis Barringer. 5 tackles.

Michigan's secondary took a hit with the loss of Ernest Shazor and Marlin Jackson and most likely will showcase a few faces at safety until solid starters emerge. At corner, Hall (left) has consistently improved after beating out former starter Markus Curry and should be a quality corner for the Wolverines this fall. Stanford transfer Mason dabbled at wide receiver but now is back at corner and will have to fill in for Marlin Jackson. He played in nickel and dime defenses before so he does have some experience. Englemon had an excellent spring and fall camp according to coaches and is credited for being a very heady player. Barringer, who started 6 games in 2003, is listed as the starter on the most recent depth chart, but that might not even last until the Notre Dame game. Depth: Ryan Mundy has had an injury-filled fall so far and if healthy would be the odds on favorite to start over Barringer. How soon he is able to play at full strength will determine how soon he sees the majority of minutes at free safety. Sophomore Jamar Adams is young and inexperienced but should challenge Englemon for the starting strong safety spot all year long. A third safety in the mix is one-time ND commit, Brandon Harrison, who was quickly moved to safety from corner and is likely to see time this fall at free safety. Pushing for Mason's starting spot are senior Darnell Hall and sophomore Chris Stewart, who have both had a strong fall camp. Finally, converted wide receiver and speedster Morgan Trent will backup Leon Hall.

MSU

CB - Demond Williams.
CB - Ashton Watson. 10 tackles, 1 INT, 1 BrUp.
SS - Eric Smith. 115 tackles. 3.0 TFL, 9 BrUp, 2 FR, 1 FF. - Returning Starter.
FS - Greg Cooper. 17 tackles, 5 BrUp.

The Spartans defensive backfield has been a big question mark entering fall camp as players switched positions, were suspended, and declared inelgible while Coach Smith tried to find four starters. The big name in this unit is Smith (right), who starred for Michigan State at the Bandit position last year. He will bring leadership and experience to a shaky unit as the leading returning tackler on the roster. Next to Smith at free safety will be Greg Cooper, who isn't a terribly big player at 5'11" 187lbs, but is exceptionally quick and should help out the new cornerbacks. Watson is one of those new starters at corner after playing in the nickel and on special teams last year as well as special teams. He may be a new full-time starter, but he has played in 31 games and has 5 starts to his credit. JUCO transfer Demond Williams earned the other corner spot after an impressive fall camp. Depth: The best corner on the team still isn't officially a part of the team as former starter Jaren Hayes is looking to return from a suspension that had him classified as a walk-on. Odds are that he will be re-instated and will start against Notre Dame in 2 weeks. MSU's other back-up corners showcase their extreme lack of depth at corner. Travis Key is a former walk-on currently listed as #2 to Williams while true freshman Ross Weaver is next in line behind Watson. Another freshman, Kendall Davis , was expected to contribute but was just declared ineligible and won't be able to play this season.

WASHINGTON

CB - Matt Fountanie. 20 tackles, 2.0 TFL, 1 INT, 2 BrUp.
CB - Roy Lewis.
SS - C.J. Wallace. 66 tackles, 5.0 TFL, 3 BrUp, 1 INT, 1 FR. 1 FF. - Returning Starter.
FS - Dashon Goldson. 64 tackles, 1.0 TFL, 2 INT, 5 BrUp, 2 FR, 1 FF. - Returning Starter.

The only two spots on the Husky defense that don't return a starter are corner. And the competition for those spots has been wide open. Fountanie (left) has locked down one of the starting corner spots and the sophomore will make the leap from the team's nickel back to #1 corner. Irish fans may remember him as he had an interception last year against Notre Dame. Lewis transfered into Washington from San Jose State and will be expected to be an instant contributor in his first year as a starter. Wallace is the most experienced player in the secondary and finished 4th on the team in tackles last year. He was solid in run support last year and now will be expected to help out more against the pass. Goldson battled a shoulder injury last season but still finished right behind Wallace on the tackle list, but the former JUCO transfer will now need to be a leader for the younger corners. Depth: Nevada transfer Chris Handy has impressed the coaching staff with his athletic ability and should push for a starting safety spot. JUCO transfer Josh Okoebor missed last year with a knee injury but is back now, even if the injury is still slowing him down. Clarence Simpson flashed potential as a freshman but suffered through an injury-plagued sophomore year. He voluntarily sat out spring practice, but now is back and working towards playing time. A huge option at strong safety, 6'6" 215lb Chris Hemphill will provide some depth behind Wallace.

PURDUE

CB - Brian Hickman. 52 tackles, 1 INT, 8 BrUp, 1 FR. - Returning Starter.
CB - Paul Long. 23 tackles, 2.0 TFL, 1.0 sack, 1 INT, 4 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
SS - Bernard Pollard. 96 tackles, 3.0 TFL, 1.0 sack, 1 INT, 5 BrUp, 2 FF. - Returning Starter.
FS - Kyle Smith. 76 tackles, 3.0 TFL, 3 BrUp, 2 FF. - Returning Starter.

All four starters for Purdue return, but it is a bit of a mixed blessing. The obvious benefits of continutity and returning experience are slightly negated by the fact that these four allowed 240 yards per game through the air last season (for comparison, ND gave up 280 yards per game) and only totaled 3 interceptions. Those numbers should improve this year, but perhaps not drastically. Hard hitting Pollard (right) lead the team in tackles last season and should be a leading contender to do so again if he can keep his mouth shut. Smith was third in tackles (it's not always a good sign to have both safeties in the Top 3 in tackles) and has great size for free safety at 6'4" 216lb. Long entered the starting lineup after an injury to the previous starter so doesn't have quite as much experience as the other starters. He is a bit of a safety playing corner at 6'2", but should be much improved after going through all of fall camp as the starter. Hickman is an experienced senior, but has been picked on before by opposing quarterbacks and will give up the occasional big play. Depth: Pushing Hickman will be Zach Logan, who earned praise from Coach Tiller for his play this fall and will be a big plus for Purdue's depth. Torii Williams was looking like he might beat out Kyle Smith at free safety but was injured and now will redshirt. True freshman Jason Werner has a shot to earn some playing time in his place. Fabian Martin was praised as the most improved corner and will start off the year backing up Paul Long.

USC

CB - Justin Wyatt. 40 tackles, 4.5 TFL, 1 INT, 7 BrUp, 1 FF. - Returning Starter.
CB - Terrell Thomas. 9 tackles, 2 INT, 2 BrUp.
SS - Darnell Bing. 63 tackles, 8.0 TFL, 0.5 sacks, 2 INT, 7 BrUp, 2 FF. - Returning Starter.
FS - Scott Ware. 16 tackles, 1 BrUp.

The Trojan defensive backfield will rely heavily on it's excellent pair of safeties to lead a unit that had a few rough spots last year. However, a fair number of those inconsistent performances can be attributed to nagging injuries and now that everyone appears healthy, the Southern Cal secondary should be a force for the Trojan defense. The marquee name is Bing (left), who is not only one of the fastest players on the team, but also one of the best safeties in the nation. He's a huge hitter with the speed to cover any receiver. With his shoulder issues seemingly past him, he is poised for a monster season. Joining him in the category of ready to go is Scott Ware, who is also past various injuries that limited him last season. The former JUCO All-American has impressive size for a free safety at 6'3" 220lbs. At corner,Wyatt is now healthy and ready to be a lockdown corner. He isn't the biggest corner at 5'10" 185lbs but his speed and experience will help him considerably. Thomas lacks experience so he will have to rely on his teammates for support and leadership. Still, at 6'2" 195lbs, the sophomore has plenty of size and a bright future. Depth: Losing Eric Wright to off-the-field issues hurts the team depth, but there are a number of talented underclassmen who should see the field this year. Senior John Walker hasn't played much during his time in LA, but will be the nickel back while Paul Harris, who recently sprained an ankle, should see time in the dime as a corner . Freshmen Kevin Thomas and Cary Harris also might see the field given Carroll's penchant for playing freshman early and often.

BYU

CB - Nate Soelberg. 41 tackles, 1 INT, 5 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
CB - Chris Hale.
L. Katback - Spencer White. 50 tackles, 4.0 TFL, 2.0 sacks, 2 INT, 2 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
R. Katback - K.C. Bills.
Cougar - Dustin Gabriel. 19 tackles, 1 INT.

The Cougars have fought through an injury-filled fall camp that saw 11 different defensive backs miss practice time with injuries. This makes picking starters a bit difficult for head coach Bronco Mendenhall and even moreso for this preview. BYU's 3-3-5 defense relies on a number of defensive backs with double safties called Katbacks and a Cougar back which is basically a strong safety type who lines up all over the field. The problem for BYU is that only two defensive backs have much experience at all. White is one who does have more than a few starts under his belt and will start at one of the katback spots. The other experience player is corner Soelberg (right), who won the Mountain West 100M dash title in track in 2002. The other starting corner spot is still being contested, but Chris Hale seems to have the upper hand at the moment. The converted receiver will need to quickly get used to his new position. The right katback spot is still up in the air with K.C. Bills recently having a good showing in fall camp. Gabriel has been injured during fall camp, but once healthy should take the Cougarback position. Depth: If Gabriel can't go, look for David Tafuna to play in his place. Quinn Gooch is fighting Bills for the starting Katback spot while Justin Robinson and Kayle Buchanan are just trying to get healthy.

TENNESSEE

CB - Jason Allen. 123 tackles, 3.0 TFL, 2.0 sacks, 2 INT, 5 BrUp, 2 FR, 3 FF. - Returning Starter.
CB - Roshaun Fellows. 39 tackles, 2.0 TFL, 3 INT, 11 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
SS - Antwan Stewart.
FS - Jonathan Hefney. 65 tackles, 2.5 TFL, 0.5 sacks, 1 INT, 10 BrUp. - Returning Starter.

The Volunteers finished dead last in the SEC last year in pass defense but after a trial by fire 2004, three starters return and aim to improve the Tennessee pass defense. As the leading tackler in the SEC last season, Allen (left) is going to have very high expectations for this season as he moves from safety back to corner. Fellows was named a Freshman All-American last season for his performance and led the team in pass deflections. It's safe to say this season will see even more production from the returning starter. Another Freshman All-American last season, Hefney will move over to the starting free safety spot to make way for Allen at corner. He was the 4th leading tackler on the team last season which is impressive for a player who checks in at 5'10" 174lbs. Stewart was scheduled to start in 2004 after starting 5 games in 2003, but a torn ACL put him on the shelf for the year. His return this season is a huge boost to the Vol defense. Depth: Corey Campbell registered four interceptions last season and will be a quality backup at the safety position, assuming he doesn't become the outright starter. Sophomore Antonio Gaines has the lead for the nickel back slot and will push Fellows for the starting gig. Adding to the young and talented theme, Tennessee brought in a handful of big name secondary recruits. Demetrice Morley has already impressed the coaching staff and will see time at either safety or cornerback this year while Adam Myers-White provides nice size at 6'3" and will fight to see time at free safety.

NAVY

CB - Jeremy McGown. 91 tackles, 2 BrUp. - Returning Starter.
CB - Greg Thrasher.
Rover - Keenan Little. 12 tackles, 1 BrUp.
FS - DuJuan Price. 16 tackles, 3 INT, 2 BrUp.

The secondary was supposed to be a big strength of the Navy defense, but a last minute defection will hurt a unit that still figures to be one of the better ones on the team. McGown (right) was a productive safety last season that finished 4th on the team in tackles but now will move over to help out at cornerback. While the position switch isn't always easy, he's expected to be a quality starter. Thrasher is the fastest guy on the team, but does not have much experience. How quickly he picks things up will determine how effective this unit can be. Price has to replace the team's leading tackler from last season and has the size at 5'11" 217lb to be a sure tackling free safety. One of the better prospects in the backfield, Little will start at the rover position after being the primary nickel back last season. Depth: The team depth took a hit when starting corner Hunter Reddick transfered to Maryland. Greg Sudderth is a young player with plenty of potential that could be the starting free safety come the Notre Dame game. He turned down full rides from Maryland and Georgia Tech to attend the Academy which speaks highly of his athletic ability. Rashawn King had a solid camp and now is the primary backup to McGown.

SYRACUSE

CB - Tanard Jackson. 56 tackles, 1.5 TFL, 2 INT, 4 BrUp, 1 FR. - Returning Starter.
CB - Steve Gregory. played WR in 2004
SS - Dowayne Davis. 7 tackles.
FS - Anthony Smith. 85 tackles, 1.0 TFL, 3 INT, 4 BrUp, 1 FF. - Returning Starter.

Syracuse is another team looking to improve on an awful 2004. The Orange secondary finished 90th in the nation and now much replace two starters. Jackson (left) has solidified himself as the #1 corner but still needs to work on not letting up the big play. Gregory was one of Syracuse's best corners in 2002 and 2003, but was shifted to wide receiver in 2004. Now back at corner he worked his way up the depth chart during the fall and regained his starting slot. Smith is a big hitter at free safety and one of the better safeties in the Big East. He will be a leader of the Orange defense. Sophomore Dowayne Davis seems to have finally taken over the starting spot at strong safety, but his position is far from safe. Depth: Pushing Davis is Reggie McCoy, another sophomore with limited experience. DeAndre LaCaille lost the starting corner job to Gregory but will likely be the nickel back for Syracuse. Thomas Whitfield and Marcus Clayton will likely fight it out for playing time when the Orange use a dime formation.

STANFORD

CB - T. J. Rushing. 36 tackles, 6.0 TFL, 2.0 sacks, 1 BrUp, 1 FR.
CB - Nick Sanchez. 2 tackles, 1 INT.
SS - Brandon Harrison. 45 tackles, 2.5 TFL, 2.0 sacks, 1 INT, 1 BrUp, 2 FR. - Returning Starter.
FS - Trevor Hooper. 13 tackles, 0.5 TFL.

Early on, Stanford's pass defense is looking like a weak spot for this year's defense. Two starters return to a position that finished 96th in the nation last year. Rushing (right) is an exciting athlete and a weapon on special teams, but has never translated that to becoming a top shelf corner. He has experience with 8 starts to his credit over a 3-year period, but now will have to produce each and every game against the other team's best. Sanchez is the least experienced of the group with only 2 tackles on his career total so he will need to be ready as other teams will throw his way early and often. The second safety named Brandon Harrison that the Irish will face is the only returning starter for the Cardinal secondary and will to be a leader for the rest of the group. Hooper actually started 11 games in 2003 at strong safety but did not play much last season and now has been moved to free safety where he will start. Depth: Tim Sims is still adjusting to the position after moving from wide receiver and most likely will start out as the nickel back. Former walk-on David Lofton is backing up Hooper at free safety where his 6'4" 220lb frame is a big bonus. Sophomores Carlos McFall and Wopamo Osaisai.

2005 Opponent Secondary Analysis and Ranking

Really, when I started on this position I thought it was going to be far deeper and more challenging than it now appears. Sure the occiasional All-American is going to line up across from Quinn; most notably Bing and Allen, but on the whole the opposing secondaries aren't that impressive. Eight of the eleven teams return two or fewer starters.

What all this means is that we may see even more passing than I had orignally thought. The Pitt game will be interesting in terms of watching the wide receivers. If our receivers are able to get separation from the Pitt corners coming out of cuts or position themselves to get between the defender and the ball consistently, it could be a very good year for the ND passing offense as Pitt has an above average secondary.

Now, cornerback levels aren't the only thing standing between Quinn and a record-breaking season as I haven't even mentioned vitally important things just as defensive coaching and defensive line pass rush. But once that ball is in the air, most of those things go out the window and it comes down to which player, the receiver or the defender, is going to be in a better position to catch the ball. Given the inexperience on a bunch of the teams the Irish face in 2005, I'd like to think our veteran receiving corps will had an advantage in most games.

Here's my take at ranking the opponent secondaries. I think it's safe to say there is a legitimate dropoff from Purude at #5 to Washington at #6. Pitt, Michigan, and Purdue are all fairly close, but the Huskies and teams below them all have serious questions mark in the talent and depth categories.

1. Tennessee - Experience, production, talent, and a very deep bench.
2. USC - By the time they roll into South Bend, they could easily take the #1 spot.
3. Pitt - Probably the best corner tandem the Irish face. Average depth.
4. Michigan - Starting spots are still up for grabs between multiple talented athletes.
5. Purdue - Experience is there. Now just need to shut down opposing receivers.
6. Washington - A decent mix of experience and talent. Transfers help depth.
7. Syracuse - If Gregory reverts to 2002 form, this group could move up a spot or two.
8. Navy - Impressive showing for a position that usually is a weak spot for Navy.
9. BYU - Soelberg and White are a good tandem. Rest are unknowns.
10. MSU - Smith keeps the Spartans out of 11th place. Little to no depth here.
11. Stanford - Some decent athletes, but a lack of experience and depth.